The Bible: Choice Cuts

Andrew Brown: Andrew Motion’s call to teach the bible will fail | Comment is free |

All these are stories which enrich the world and which children ought
to know. But is it right to teach them as literature, or to justify
them solely as stories? Here, I think Motion is on shakier ground.
These stories have been preserved by people who thought they were true,
and fantastically important, rather than merely interesting. To know
them was not just an aesthetic value, but a moral one. In particular,
they were taught because the teachers believed that you could not be a
properly developed human being without knowing them. The unique thing
about Bible stories was that they were understood to stand apart from
all other books because they were suited for everyone, as well as
necessary for everyone.

Yes, absolutely.

Wherefore David arose and went, he and his men, and slew of the Philistines two hundred men; and David brought their foreskins, and they gave them in full tale to the king, that he might be the king’s son in law. And Saul gave him Michal his daughter to wife.

Not one of the better known Bible stories, but one worth telling the kids about nonetheless, for moral reasons. So that they become properly developed human beings.

2 Responses to “The Bible: Choice Cuts”

  1. 1 KevanB February 21, 2009 at 8:17 pm

    Amen, Amen.

  2. 2 ParkaDude March 2, 2009 at 6:59 pm

    Yeah, yeah, moral values.
    And they pretend not to know the the their Lord in the Lord’s prayer actually was the Lord of the Armies.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

I on Twitter

February 2009

%d bloggers like this: