Archive for September 16th, 2005

Slug Fest

The prominence given to the absurd Hitchens-Galloway debate is embarrassing, to say the least. (So why are you writing about it then? – imaginary ed)

If all that is at stake is a Blur vs. Oasis-style expression of preference, then I pick Hitchens, purely on the grounds that he is on occasion an entertaining writer, and I deplored Galloway’s crass moralising about the former’s drinking. As a rule, I can trust a man who doesn’t drink, but I can’t trust a man who never stops referring to the fact that he doesn’t drink. Also I pity Hitchens, because anyone who puts himself at the service of so many masters is doomed to a ridiculous end. In sum, though, I find both personalities almost equally objectionable.

The ‘debate’ is just another media event, in which the supposed subject – ‘The war in Iraq was necessary and just’, by the way – was of far lesser import than the slavish fascination surrounding the two men and their quixotic trajectories. Oh, and George Galloway is on a book tour.

Gary Younge is right to observe that:

when historians come to judge Wednesday’s event the first question they might ask is why in a city the size of New York, two British polemicists were needed to conduct it.

In the size of New York, yes, but also about a country the size of Iraq, full of Iraqis who can speak for themselves. The most hyped debate for some time about the Iraq war is one with no Iraqis. Spiffing.

Advertisements

I on Twitter

September 2005
M T W T F S S
« Aug   Oct »
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  
Advertisements